Research paper on Confidentiality in Mediation

Research paper on Confidentiality in Mediation Introduction Mediation refers to a process whereby the parties involved in a dispute identify the issues, then proceed to develop the necessary options, look at the alternatives available and eventually come to an agreement being assisted by a third party or mediator. It is basically an alternative to resolving disputes of two or more parties without necessarily going to court. One thing to note however, is the fact that the process of mediation can only take place if both parties involved in the dispute agree. The process is so confidential that the discussion terms need not be disclosed to anyone outside the parties involved. The mediator helps the two parties to come to an agreement. A mediator is not allowed to take sides, offer guidance or make any judgments but develops communication and builds a consensus of the parties. There are cases where the mediator is allowed to give his/her own view but with consent from the parties involved. At the end of it all, the mediator ensures that a soluti on has been found and all the parties are happy. The techniques used by the mediators depend on their training and skill to ensure that parties come to an agreement in a manner that is informed and voluntary. This method of solving disputes can be used in very many situations including family, consumer, contract and neighborhood disputes. The dynamics, timetable and structure that mediation has cannot be found in any ordinary negotiations. The mediation process has several qualities like voluntary, collaborative, controlled, confidential, informed, satisfying and self-responsible, safe, balanced, neutral and impartial. Voluntary means one can leave his/her own pleasure either with or without a reason. The collaborative quality implies that all parties are motivated to solve issues together and come to agreements. Controlled means that each and every participant has the power to make a decision and nothing can be imposed on anybody. Informed aspect means that this mediation process gives the involved parties an opportunity to obtain and even incorporate advice and information from legal experts. The other quality is that of safe, balanced, neutral and impartiality. According to this quality, the mediator has a balanced and equal responsibility to assist either party and should not in any case favor any party or the out come of the process. The mediator is obligated ethically to acknowledge any bias that is substantive on the discussion issues. Satisfying and self-responsible is another quality of mediation that is based on voluntarily participating on resolving issues, satisfaction as well as compliance are not elevated through courts but rather through mediation. The last quality which this research paper will focus on is confidential. Mediation is generally confidential by evidence, statute and contract as you agree and desire. It is required that the mediator should explain confidentiality and exceptions of the same therefore any meetings between the parties and the mediator should be well defined. Any ruling by the state that evidence which is prepared and used in the process of mediation is not confidential undermines the process. Mediation as a process of solving conflicts is becoming a very popular way of resolving disputes, especially the commercial ones. In the United States, it is mostly connected with domestic disputes among others. In cases where the process does not succeed, the parties mostly resort to arbitration or sometimes litigation. There are various advantages of choosing mediation as a way of solving conflicts. One of the advantages is that it is less expensive and takes less time. Even though a mediator may charge a fee, it is not as expensive as that of an attorney and does not involve moving from case to case hence saves time. When you spend less money, it in return means less money is involved. Another advantage is that it offers flexible and multiple ways of resolving a dispute. In court cases, the parties get a resolution which leaves neither party happy. On the other hand, in mediation, parties can control the resolution which can be very unique to the issue or dispute. Mediation theref ore results in a win/win situation. Mutual endeavor is also associated with mediation. In negotiations, parties focus on their positions but in mediation, parties are ready to come up with a solution which means that the parties are ready to move their positions. As mentioned earlier in the article, mediation takes place in the presence of a mediator who has been trained in matters of resolving conflicts and is thus neutral helping the parties to get an avenue to resolve disputes. Last but not least is that it is a process that is very confidential. Nobody apart from the parties and the mediator knows what has happened during the forum. It is so important that a mediator cannot be forced to testify in the court as to the progress of the process. There are exceptions to confidentiality in cases involving criminal acts or child abuse. This paper will mostly look at whether in the context of the mediation; the communications made are confidential in that they need not be disclosed in a rbitration or litigation proceedings. Literature Review This part of the paper reviews into details the relevant literature regarding confidentiality in mediation. It is imperative to note that confidentiality has been proven to have significant outcomes in certain states, such as California State. Several literatures have common arguments concerning confidentiality of mediation and its success in law. Bartens (2004) asserts that in order for family mediators to protect their clients as well as themselves from unlawful disclosure of a client’s admission, the mediator should embrace the principles established in Tarasoff vs. Regents of California University, when violence threats are presented by any of his clients. In this case, California’s Supreme Court gave a ruling that professionals of mental health have an obligation of protecting people who are threatened with bodily harm by any patient. The supreme court of California ruled that professionals not only have a duty to protect the patient, but also the individuals who are threatened by the patient. The ruling has since been embraced by a majority of the states in United States and has significantly influenced several jurisdictions elsewhere in the world. A movement that is popular in applying alternative resolution of dispute exists, instead of allowing the state to handle such matters as the legal issues of a family through its process of litigation. The job of the mediator of the family is ensuring that agreements are facilitated between the parties instead of adjudicating decisions. Those who support mediation in family disputes harbor the fact that it is an imperative form of resolving disputes as compared to the process of litigation. Mediation heavily depends on the parties to come to a solution that is mutually acceptable (Bartens, 2004). Bartens’ sentiments are echoed by Allen (2008), who talks about the success of several cases that were resolved through mediation. For instance, Cumbria Waste Management Ltd and Lakeland Waste Management Ltd vs. Baines Wilson (2008), that was heard in the Birmingham Mercantile Court by Judge Frances Kirkham is one of the cases that embraced the process of confidentiality of the mediation. When the judge was informed that the case should be resolved through confidentiality, the judge found it unreasonable. This is because it is not the judge’s duty to give mediation, but is a privilege entered into by both parties. Surprisingly, one of the parties did not agree to embrace the privilege of confidentiality. This case was being defended by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA).apparently, DEFRA did not give in to apply its possessed privilege and its right to confidentiality. The judge was only given the agreements of mediation but no documentation was tabled. The judge saw this as unreasonable and only wanted the mediators to have freedom and carry out mediations without fearing that their information would be disclosed to others. The judge viewed this as an exception to the legislation that confidentiality is not a bar where disclosure of materials would be done to other individuals. This was a bold decision which reinforced security of what takes place at mediations. Harvard Law Review also acknowledges the fact that mediation is gaining popularity as the better option for adversarial justice. Similarly it is very important to properly define the extent to which privilege rules should offer mediation communications confidentiality. The atmosphere of trust is fostered by confidentiality which is fundamental in mediation. Under the law, it is not easy for a mediator to promise that all that is said in mediation will be confidential even when a party that is not satisfied decides to go to court to seek for testimony in regards to mediation. Since mediation is a form of negotiating for justice, all parties must come to a consensus in a voluntary manner. This ultimately implies that mediation plays a significant role in shaping both the discussion’s agenda and the consensus. Therefore, the mediator is depicted to be a catalyst that has the mandate of striving to coerce the clients (Harvard Law Review, 1984). Furthermore, several literatures accord parties many advantages, when it comes to mediation. Breaching mediation is one area that many authors agree should not happen in any way. Powles (2001) asserts that while the process of mediation is a confidential matter, any communication to the mediator in private sessions should not be disseminated to other clients without their prior consent. This therefore implies that the mediators will achieve full trust from the parties involved. Powles continues to say that a proper dialogue should be established from the beginning as this is the best and less expensive way of resolving differences. Cohen (2001) argues that mediators should be concerned with the situations when their clients encounter obstacles in their way of achieving self-determination which is a fundamental value in the process of mediation. Cohen continues to remark that the moment one party encounters difficulty in understanding the whole process of mediation, or is unable to actively participate in the process, then it is the duty of the mediator to explore these obstacles together with the party. In the process of mediation, a party’s mental ability to comprehend the process as well as the discussion options in giving voluntary and informed agreement attained is referred to as capacity (Blank, 2001). This eventually implies that mediating disputes with individuals with limited capacity can be very challenging. Therefore, it is of great concern when parties of limited capacity are subjected to manipulative aspects. Mediators should ensure that this scenario does not occur (Waldman, 2001). Confidentiality in mediation One thing that is very central as indicated earlier is confidentiality. The parties should be able to communicate openly for a mediation to succeed. Confidentiality questions that may arise are complex and numerous and might not have been explored fully. The aim of this paper is not to answer all the questions but to note some of them and examine the authority of the United States in point. The question is how far confidentiality should extend. It is important to understand the considerations of the question of confidentiality in mediation. The first one is that the confidentiality encourages the parties involved to negotiate and come to an agreement. This helps avoid litigation or arbitration. The other consideration is one that inclines confidentiality based on the evidence produced to ensure that a fair decision is made. Legislation has been enacted by many jurisdictions to make mediation a confidential process. Lawyers in California however say that confidentiality in the process of mediation is in jeopardy. It is in October 2002 that the California Court of Appeal held the raw materials that were prepared for a mediation process of a dispute of construction were to be discovered as sections 1120 and 1119 of the evidence code of California that protect communications in mediation from disclosure did not apply to the raw evidence The Attorneys in Genoveva Rojas v. Los Angeles Superior Court who represent the party involved want The California Supreme Court to reaffirm the confidentiality of these documents. This case came as a result of concerns raised by tenants about a leakage of water as well as mold in the building. Julie Coffin who was the owner of the building sued those who built it for defects in construction. The court issued an order for the parties involved to use mediation as away to settle their dispute. This case was later settled and the agreement provided that the terms had t o be confidential together with their samples as well as consultants work. The tenants later sued the owner and the developer. The trial court then ruled that the documents which were submitted for the mediation process were considered in the State Evidence Code. The tenants went ahead to appeal but the court of appeal continued holding to the fact that privilege only applies to communications, negotiations, discussions and admissions that were designed to resolve the dispute through the process of mediation. Coffin argues that the designation of the privilege of mediation to be used in mediation should be interpreted to come to a resolution and holding otherwise contravenes the intent of the legislature. When we look at the United States, the schemes of confidentiality of mediation in California are very comprehensive. The provisions advocate for the production of evidence. The above case very well describes the nature of confidentiality in California’s Supreme Court (ADR Ne ws, 2003). Both the legislature and courts have embraced the use of mediation in resolving disputes in California. The statutes also foster the popularity of mediation. An example is section Four hundred and sixty five of the professions and Business code of California which states that encouragement of mediation helps to achieve more efficient and effective resolution of dispute in society. The courts of Appeal as well as the Ninth Circuit also have mediation programs that are well established. The importance of confidentiality in California took effect even before 2001.It was in 1998 that the Legislature consolidated the rules of confidentiality into one chapter for purposes of providing a comprehensive and standard set of rules that would apply to voluntary and court ordered mediations. The statutes of California also make anything communicated in regards to mediation to be confidential. Section 1119(a) of the code of evidence of California, says that no evidence or submission of anything in the mediation process is admissible and any disclosure of the evidence, will not be compelled in a given arbitration, any administrative, civil or any other proceeding that is noncriminal in which according to the law, one can be compelled to give evidence. Writings that result from the mediation process are made to be inadmissible and confidential in section 1119(b) of the same statute. The Uniform mediation Act of the state laws in section four also provides confidentiality in the process of mediation. This was also supported by the family court review. Rules of Confidentiality Before I look at the rules of confidentiality, it is important to note that before the parties are involved in a mediation process, they have to sign an agreement of confidentiality. In this agreement, all parties agree that they have a dispute, which they have to solve through mediation; that the parties involved release their mediator from any claims that would arise out of their failure to come to an agreement, that the mediator is not a definite indication that they would agree; any of the parties that forwards a claim for the mediator to produce the records or testify will indemnify the affected mediator of any expenses, costs, losses liabilities; that the mediator does not know any potential or actual conflicts of interest that might in turn affect the impartial ability of the mediator, the mediator is to be given all the necessary protection as in 1127-California Code of evidence; the agreement is also admissible in any future proceeding in order to prove that an agreement exi sted which is binding on the parties and is admissible according section 1123 of the California Evidence Code and last but not least is confidentiality where they agree that the mediation is according to California Code of Evidence Rule 408,1115-1128,1152, federal evidence rules and other sections of federal law and code of evidence counterparts. The last agreement which is the focus of discussion emphasizes that statements that are made during the process of mediation are supposed to be confidential. When this agreement is signed, the parties waive any potential and actual conflicts (Sourdin, 2005). Any breach of this agreement, therefore would result into injury that is irreparable. The first rule of confidentiality looks at the definitions. Examples of these definitions include agreement, conciliation and the costs of the reference, days, dispute, mediation, nominee, preliminary conference and mediation. Most of the terms have been defined or described in the previous paragraphs but some have not. Another word for mediation is conciliation. The cost of the reference has the expenses and fee of the mediator/nominee/conciliator. Days refer to the working days except public holidays, Saturdays and Sundays. The disputes are the issues referred to conciliation. A preliminary conference is a meeting that has been appointed to deal with the administrative or procedural matters to do with mediation. The second rule of confidentiality is the appointment of a mediator. This rule says that unless it is agreed in writing by the involved parties, mediation shall be carried out either by a person agreed between the parties or by a person nominated by the institute. It also indicates that the nominee shall give a written notice to the parties to do with the place and time of holding the conference and this should be within seven days of receiving this advice. At this juncture, the mediator may advise on the conditions that may include security for the expenses and fees. After the parties have accepted the conditions, the mediator or nominee shall then accept appointment. Rule number three is one of the applications of rules. It says that the rules are subject to any law that governs conciliation. In cases where the parties have chosen mediation as a way to resolve their conflict, they should then comply with the rules. From rule number four, procedure starts being seen. This rule is co nfidentiality. The advisers, parties and mediators shall not disclose any information during the mediation. They shall also use any disclosed information only during mediation and that they need to sign agreement confidentiality. The fifth rule looks at the role of the mediator. As per this rule, the mediator needs to be independent and to act impartially between the involved parties. The mediator also needs to assist the parties to come up with a solution that is mutually acceptable. This would involve, helping the parties to define the issues, come up with a procedure for resolution, and suggest resolution techniques act as a facilitator to direct the negotiations. A mediator may practice additional duties that may involve making suggestions and give opinions that would help to come up with a reasonable solution. The next rule is the role of the parties involved. This indicates that these parties need to do all things required for a proper mediation process. Each party need to comply with directions made on the procedures for example, if not appearing, they need be represented by a person with full authority to settle the dispute. Rule number seven looks at the preliminary conference. It says that unless agreed otherwise, the conciliator needs to convene a conference soon after the dispute has been referenced. Termination of the conciliation is the next rule. This rule says that any party that wishes to terminate the mediation may do so through a written notice to the other party. Rule number nine looks at the costs and says that each party needs to pay its own costs unless agreed otherwise. Extension of the Period of Limitation is the next rule. This implies that just in case the period of limitation expires during the conciliation process, the parties can agree to extend the period by the n umber of days dating from the reference date of the dispute to termination date according to the rules. The next rule looks at the subsequent proceedings. In this rule, in case the dispute is not resolved, the conciliator should not accept to be appointed as an arbitrator without getting consent from the parties involved. This consent has to a written one. Counting of days is the other rule. This period begins on the day after a notice, proposal, communication or notification is received. The last rule is the rule of liability for omissions or acts. The parties involved need to agree that the conciliator, employees and officers of their institute are not liable to any of the parties for omission of their functions unless it is shown to be fraudulent. Breaching Confidentiality Confidentiality as per the professional ethics means the ability to keep information of a relationship which is professional that is given about or by an individual secret and secure from others. In this case the relationship is gained through mediation (Franklin, 2006). Confidentiality is very important as it helps in maintaining trust. Disclosure of this information results into a breach of confidentiality. There are certain scenarios when disclosure of information does not constitute a breach of confidentiality. They include cases where the professional suspects that that a person is in the process of harming others, is acting in an illegal way or is being exploited by others. In California, the Supreme Court of California had to look at exceptions to confidentiality. Section 1119 and 1121 support this fact. The Court ruled that a mediator may report the failure of a party to the court. The court looked at two previous cases. One of them was the Rinaker vs. superior court case tha t involved harassment between juveniles and a victim who were involved in an incident of throwing of rocks. The hearing subjects were the minors claimed that the statements of the victims during mediation were different from testimony given during hearing. The court of appeal ruled that the confidentiality right must yield to the minors’ rights to go ahead and put on a defense in order to confront and cross examine the witness of the victim. In this case, the court noted that the evidence on the events and statements used during mediation did not have any comparable right. This is an example of a case where disclosure is not a breach of confidentiality. According to Bartens (2004), there are two factors that significantly determine whether confidentiality can be breached; identifying the victim and the likeliness of the potential physical harm. Consequences of breaching confidentiality When a party breaches confidentiality, then there can either be positive or negative consequences. The positive consequences of breaching confidentiality are; suspicion on any abuse or negligence can be investigated; this in turn implies that the possibility of any abuse and negligence in may be avoided in future. Any plan in committing suicide may also be prevented before it happens. Any necessary interventions can be brought up for any party to be assisted in such areas (Springhouse, 2000). On the other hand, according to Springhouse, (2000), the negative consequences are as follows; stern disciplinary action may be given to a health worker who breached the confidentiality of the patient. The client may suffer from emotional distress and embarrassment. An irreversible damage may be encountered by the relationship between the health worker and the patient. Finally, the client may decide to take legal action against the health care worker as well as the institution. The institution may be obliged to pay for the damages caused by the health care worker. Ethics and standards for behaving professionally are vital when it comes to breaching confidentiality. There are security mechanisms that are able to offer protection to the data of the patient and it is ethical that the staff correctly and consistently make good use of them. Breaching confidentiality results in very costly and time consuming legal actions that are taken against the institutions that give healthcare services. Therefore, it is imperative to comprehend and adhere to the institution’s laid down policies and guidelines in order to avoid being referred to as being unethical. Cohen (2001) asserts that the code of ethics for mediators refers to the obligation of the mediators to the parties in a consistent manner, not to the representatives. Despite the fact that parties are represented, the mediation process is still in existence for them and not for the advocates. Conclusion Confidentiality in mediation is an important aspect and should be accorded much attention. Mediators should strive in ensuring that strict adherence to confidentiality is maintained. When a family mediator decides to breach confidentiality between him and the client, when a client poses physical harm to the other, the family mediator should be at the forefront of ensuring that strict principles of mediation are followed, thus an informed decision is made. Confidentiality in the mediation process that has been widely successful in California should make significant ways to other States.

How to Make Invisible Ink With Baking Soda

How to Make Invisible Ink With Baking Soda Follow these easy instructions to make non-toxic invisible ink, in just a few minutes, using baking soda (sodium bicarbonate). The advantages of using baking soda are that its safe (even for kids), simple to use, and readily available. Invisible Ink Ingredients Baking sodaPaperWaterLight bulb (heat source)Paintbrush or swabMeasuring cupPurple grape juice (optional) Make and Use the Ink Mix equal parts water and baking soda.Use a cotton swab, toothpick, or paintbrush to write a message onto white paper, using the baking soda solution as ink.Allow the ink to dry.One way to read the message is to hold the paper up to a heat source, such as a light bulb. You can also heat the paper by ironing it. The baking soda will cause the writing in the paper to turn brown.Another method to read the message is to paint over the paper with purple grape juice. The message will appear in a different color. The grape juice acts as a pH indicator that changes color when it reacts with the sodium bicarbonate of baking soda, which is a base. Tips for Success If you are using the heating method, avoid igniting the paper; dont use a halogen bulb.Baking soda and grape juice react with each other in an acid-base reaction, producing a color change in the paper.The baking soda mixture can also be used more diluted, with one part baking soda to two parts water.Grape juice concentrate results in a more visible color change than regular grape juice. How It Works Writing a secret message in baking soda solution slightly disrupts the cellulose fibers in paper, damaging the surface. When heat is applied, the shorter, exposed ends of the fibers darken and burn before the undamaged sections of paper. If you apply too much heat, theres a risk of igniting the paper. For this reason, its best to use either the grape juice chemical reaction or else apply a gentle, controllable heat source.

9 paragraph Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

9 paragraph - Essay Example is was pronounced by Shelley in Frankenstein saying â€Å"Nothing could exceed the love and respect which the younger cottagers exhibited towards their venerable companion. They performed towards him every little office of affection and duty with gentleness, and he rewarded them by his benevolent smiles† (Shelley 82). Opposite to love is also the feeling of desolation due to Frankenstein monstrous appearance as he was a mere creation of man. This was evident with these line â€Å"cursed, cursed creator! Why did I live? Why, in that instant, did I not extinguish the spark of existence which you had so wantonly bestowed? I know not; despair had not yet taken possession of me; my feelings were those of rage and revenge. . . when night came I quitted my retreat and wandered in the wood; and now, no longer restrained by the fear of discovery, I gave vent to my anguish in fearful howlings† (Shelley 103). Probably, Frankenstein was Shelley’s attempt put face on man’s ugliest character. Victor’s creation Frankenstein embodied all things that are ugly, wretched, vindictive, hateful and murderous which is the ugly nature of man. All this pain was not of the monster’s doing but the sin of its father which is Victor who has brought him â€Å"pain that nothing could alleviate† (57). Frankenstein also explored the bitter aspect of loving and losing someone. This happened to Victor when the monster killed his brother that he too became a figurative monster because he was consumed by vengeance and shared the monster’s desolation. In the monster’s confession, he told how desolate he felt by being alienated from society; that he â€Å"killed the boy out of revenge† (Shelley 41). The monster further confessed how miserable it feels to be alone and miserable because of his monster physique that even the family of cottagers who sheltered him that gave him hopes for compassion even drove him away. Corollary to this, the novel also explored the folly in man’s life.

Should the EU focus on acting as a civilian, normative or military Essay

Should the EU focus on acting as a civilian, normative or military power - Essay Example Before answering the question whether the EU should focus on being a civilian, normative, or military power, it is important to establish how these different forms of power have historically manifested in the EU's policies and activities. Conceptualising the terms 'civilian', 'normative', and 'military' is important in any analysis where these terms are used to describe the activities of EU's. Maull's (1990) view of a civilian power includes the employment of "solidarity with other societies, and a sense of responsibility for the future of the world - and particularly the global environment". (p.106) It is important to note that Maull's analysis of the exercise of civilian power is quite restrictive as it relates to the state or the exercise of national civilian power. Thus using a 'statist' perspective of the exercise of civilian power in the context of a supranational EU, would have its possible limitations. Vital lessons can, however, be drawn from his analysis and can be transpos ed into the EU's experience. Manner's (2002) conception of the EU as a civilian power is interpreted primarily in economic terms. Simply put, civilian power can be said to be the exercise of non-military power and would include "economic, diplomatic and cultural policy instruments." (Smith, n.d. p.1) Smith's conception of civilian power would thus exclude any use of the military, even if the military were used in situations of peace-keeping, whether armed or unarmed. To Smith (n.d.) even though the military can be used in unarmed peace-keeping situations, they have also been trained to kill and thus such an activity cannot be said to be civilian. Smith (n.d.) further identifies four core elements in the exercise of civilian power - "means; ends; use of persuasion; and civilian control over foreign (and defence) policymaking". (p.2) Consequently, in employing civilian policies, the means and the ends of those policies must be non-military, with persuasion (and not coercion) being the main instruments of achieving policy objectives. Based on the above conception of civilian power, Smith (n.d.) has argued in relation to the EU that: " clinging to the notion of civilian power EU not only stretches the term 'civilian' past its breaking point, but also tends to induce excessively rosy-eyed views of the EU as an international actor. 'Civilian' often means 'good', and deploying the 'civilian power EU' argument can close down critical analysis of actual EU foreign policy activities". (p.1) With regards to concepts of normative power, Manners (2002) views the EU's normative power as its capacity to mould or influence notions of what constitutes 'normal' in politics at the international arena. This exercise of normative power is very evident in the EU's relationship with Africa. The Council of the European Union has for instance stated that "Europe has a strong interest in a peaceful, prosperous and democratic Africa. Our strategy is intended to help Africa achieve this. "Â  

Women in Tennyson’s Poems Essay Example for Free

Women in Tennyson’s Poems Essay In â€Å"The Lady of Shallot† Tennyson portrays the lady as somewhat of a victim by being trapped in her room weaving as if she leaves she will break an elusive curse she is under. In line 63 we see that â€Å"she hath no loyal knight and true† this implies to us that she is utterly alone in her world and whether she stays or leaves men have set up a world she is doomed to fail by growing old alone or by dying. We go through the poem thinking that she is content with living in solitude looking out at the world through her mirror but when Sir Lancelot suddenly appears in Part 3 we see her look out the window and break the curse, this shows that Lancelot ultimately brought her to her death. But this point can be contradicted by the fact that Sir Lancelot did not even know he was being watched and you could argue that her own female weakness of sexuality led her to her own death. Following on the point that she is not entirely a victim it is shown in the lines â€Å"she left the web she left the loom† Tennyson’s repetition of the world ‘left’ emphasizes the gravity of her actions and the fact that she has been trapped in the tower all her life and is now leaving implies a sense of freedom, this is also shown in the line â€Å"she loosened the chain† Tennyson could be symbolising the fact she is breaking free from the constraints of a male dominated world. On the other hand we again come to feel pity for the lady at the end of the poem due to the males and Lancelot’s curt attitude to her body and Lancelot’s comment that â€Å"she has a pretty face† which suggest that the male world is ignorant and conceited. In â€Å"Godiva† we are first introduced by Tennyson to Godiva as being part of a ‘legend’ this is then wildly contradicted when we get our first glimpse of Godiva as she is seen as being controlled by her husband â€Å"the grim earl† and is just a possession towards him which gives us the sense that thi s is in fact a male dominated world this is further shown when the Earl patronises Godiva by saying â€Å"you would not let your little finger ache.† But when we get to stanza 4 we see it is a somewhat transformative stanza as Godiva starts to break away from her husband’s constraints, this is evident in the line â€Å"unclasped the wedded eagles of her belt† we start to see her transform into a strong, independent woman. Yet we still see that although she is defying her husband and riding  through town she is still made to feel extremely uncomfortable and still violated by men when she is looked at by a ‘peeping tom’ this shows although she is doing a magnificent act of defiance she is still degraded by men. On the other hand this is contradicted by the peeping tom being instantly blinded. Tennyson has used Lines such as â€Å"like a creeping sunbeam† and â€Å"like a summer moon† to maybe symbolise the fact that Godiva has huge power and capability such as the sun and moons ability to give out and create light instead of darkness. This could also signify the fact that Godiva is ending a dark time of high taxes. The last lines of the stanza express that â€Å"she took the tax away and built herself an everlasting name.† Tennyson uses the pronoun ‘she’ to emphasize the fact that it was Godiva who took away the taxes and not the earl. Therefore showing how she is ultimately stronger than the grim earl. In conclusion some may agree with the fact that although in most of Tennyson’s poems he is describing predominately male worlds and the women are presented as victims, In â€Å"Godiva† and â€Å"the Lady Of Shallot† the main characters are women who appear victims in the beginning but then ultimately break out of their confinement as inferior people and become women who make their own choice and decide how their own lives are going to go for the first time, therefore I believe they maybe are victims in some ways but the ways in which they are not overpower them.

Poems By Robert Frost And Leon :: essays research papers

Have you ever wondered what makes two places the same, but in two totally different areas? Throughout the poems â€Å"Stopping by the Woods on a Snowy Evening† by Robert Frost, and â€Å"The Bus† by Leonard Cohen, there are many similarities that take place. These similarities are the life in cities and towns, the escape into nature, and the consequences of such escapes. Throughout this essay these similarities will be explained in detail.In all cities and towns people always have obligations and responsibilities to perform. One example of this is when Robert Frost says â€Å"I have promises to keep†(pg 127). This quote proves that he has an obligation to the city and to the people at home.The Bus has it’s own similarities in the life in cities and towns. While reading the poem Leonard Cohen makes the reader feel that the bigger the city, the less homy it is. The is proven when Cohan states â€Å"Lets run away from the big city...† (pg 144). This qu ote shows that Cohan is trying to â€Å"run away† from his obligations and responsibilities.The similarities in cities and towns from â€Å"Stopping by the Woods on a Snowy Night† and â€Å"The Bus† are in both poems the character is effect by there obligations to the world. In â€Å"Stopping by the Woods on a Snowy Night† Frost’s character is honouring his responsibilities and obligations by leaving the wood to go home to his family. In â€Å"The Bus† the character wants run away from them.In both poems the author escapes into nature. At on point in â€Å"Stopping by the Woods on a Snowy Night† Frost’s character notices the beauty of the forest around him: â€Å"The woods are lovely, dark, and deep† (pg 127). This shows that the character has a deep feelings for the nature around him.Leonard Cohen also escapes into nature in his poem. When his character is riding the bus home he says to the bus driver â€Å"Lets find o urselves a tiny american fishing village, in unknown Florida† (pg144). With this quote he expresses that he is picturing a beautiful place out in the middle of no-where. A place the is beautiful and relaxing to him.In both poems the escape into nature is obvious. In â€Å"Stopping by the Woods on a Snowy Night† Frost is showing us how beautiful mother nature really is. Meanwhile in â€Å"The Bus† Cohan was dreaming of how beautiful and relaxing his tiny fishing village would be.

Social Worker Field

Name: Monique Headley Course/Section: BEHS453 6980 Project #1 Paper Social Work is a profession for those with a strong desire to help improve people’s lives. Social workers assist people by helping them cope with and solve problems they may have in their daily lives, such as family and personal problems and dealing with relationships. Social workers assist can be child, family, and school social workers. They all provide social services and assistance to improve the social and psychological functioning of children and families. Some social workers specialize with child protective services, adoption agencies, or foster care.In this particular situation, I interviewed a friend of mine’s social worker Ms. Ayunda. A social worker serves as the link between the child and families. She addressed problems such as the child misbehavior, family problems, parent drug problem, family abuse, etc. Ms. Ayunda has been a social worker for 6 years. She has worked as a Social Worker fo r Child and Family Services Agency in Washington, DC. Her duties include, working a 40 hour week and some weekends meeting with clients, attending meetings, and coordinating services to help assist with the child or family. Ms.Ayunda is a family social worker. She provides social services and assistance to families. She keeps a record and history of all family updates, concerns, interests, and conflicts. If any abuse or neglect is present, she reports it to child protective services, and from there a resolution happens. Sometimes a child will be placed with a foster home, foster care, or adoption agency depending on their home situation. It has to be hard as a social worker to deal with people’s behavior, children feelings, and emotions. You must have to emotionally be strong and ready to handle anything in this career field.The academic training that prepared Ms. Ayunda for her Social Worker career was first receiving a bachelor’s degree in Social Work. Then she recei ved her master’s degree in social work after 2 years where she concentrated on her chosen field. That helped her develop the skills required to perform clinical assessments, manage large caseloads, take on supervisory roles, and a way on how to explore things upon a client’s need. Ms. Ayunda then got her license in DC & MD, which is a requirement for social work practice and the use of professional titles.Also, Ms. Ayunda stressed that as a social worker you have to be strong, responsible, willing to work independently, and able to communicate well with your clients and colleagues. Right now I am pursuing my BA degree in Psychology. My interest is Social Worker now and I will defiantly look into this. The reason why Ms. Ayunda became a social worker is because she wants to make a positive impact on someone’s life. She is furthering a cause that she is passionate about and she wants to help countless others overcome comparable obstacles.There are so many stories and situations she witnessed of children being abused and neglected in their homes or parents struggling and can’t afford to take care of their child. She even runs into families who parent(s) are on drugs. To make a change and to be that person to make that change is an honor. The challenges that she has faced were when she had to take action and have CPT take children from their home because their parents were on drugs, neglected their child, abused them, or another serious issue. Few parents spoke harsh words to her and acted very violent.Even the child will not speak to her because they felt as though it was her fault they were taken away or they didn’t want to get in trouble by their parent. The child will be crying for their parents and it is just a situation that you never want to happen because you don’t want to break up a home or separate a child from their parent. As far as balancing your work with your life responsibilities beyond work Ms. Ayunda just recognize her boundaries and separate her professional and personal lives. That has to be so hard to see and witness a child’s pain and their parent’s pain.I really felt for Ms. Ayunda at that moment when she mentioned the challenges she faced. In one case a mother was on drugs, had bi-polar, and was schizophrenic. The mother had a 9 year old son and the case opened when she had an episode walking with her son on the highway into traffic and saying that she was going to kill herself. Someone reported other things to Child Protective Services that the mother neglects the child and he stays out real late at time. The mother did have drugs in her system when tested.For the fact that the mother was using illegal drugs and had a psychological sickness made her even worst. The 9 year old mother was not herself when she did drugs or didn’t take her medication. When you are on drugs you tend to abuse your child and when they interviewed the boy he did mention that his mother abused him. It was not the form of punishment abuse, but she would hit him obsessively to a point he will have marks on him. The boy even came to school with a black eye the next day he got suspended from school. When he got suspended he was scared to go home.They put the boy in counseling and some days he would not speak to the counselors scared he will get in trouble by his mother if he does. There were many more episodes that occurred and the child had to be taken from Child Protective Services. Family violence is an act by a member of a family or household against another member of the family or household that is intended to result in physical harm, bodily injury, assault, or sexual assault, or that is a threat that reasonably places the member in fear of imminent physical harm or bodily injury (Gosselin, 2010, pp. 31).Child abuse and child neglect is defined as any recent act or failure to act on the part of a parent or caretaker, which results in death, serious physical or emotional harm, sexual abuse, or exploitation, or an act or failure to act, which presents an imminent risk of serious harm (Gosselin, 2010, pp. 93-94). A child that is being physically abused behavior indicators is withdrawal, aggressiveness, frightens of parents, afraid to go home, reports of injury by parents (Module 3). In Ms. Ayunda case the child was abused by his mother and hurtful things were said to him as well.Emotional abuse plays a role in the mother and 9 year old boy’s case. Emotional abuse includes excessive, aggressive, or unreasonable parental behavior that places demands on a child to perform beyond his or her capabilities (Module 3). The signs of emotional abuse are uncommunicative behavior, unreasonable fearful or suspicious, lack of interest in social contacts, or evasiveness (Gosselin, 2010). I think that a lot of hurt is said to a child when their parents are using drugs and also are bi-polar/schizophrenic because they are not themselves.The motherà ¢â‚¬â„¢s background explains a lot. My friend was abused by her son’s father and she was raped by her uncle when she was in her young teens. Her mother’s mother was schizophrenic, so that was a genetic psychological behavior that passed to her. A lot of times when you do not get counseling and you are raped at a young age it can really mess you up. Some people turn to drugs because they think that drug’s heals them, makes them feel better, and forget their problems. Really they need to receive psychological help or counseling.It looks like the boy’s mother went through a lot and as she got older she got worst. Now, her son is receiving counseling and I think that is good because the things his mother done to him, around him, and him being taken away from his family really can affect him. After reading the Modules and Textbook I came across that the boy was being neglected by his mother. Neglect is defined as failure or refusal to provide care or services for your child when there is an obligation to do so (Gosselin, 2010). Neglect is one of the primary types of family violence in the textbook.When you leave a young child unsupervised or unattended that can be considered as neglect and many people do not look at it like that (Gosselin, 2010). Module 3 describes three types of neglect and how child neglect is the failure to provide for the child’s basic needs. In this case the mother was doing self-neglect. The mother was refusing to take her medications for her psychological behavior and using drugs in her household which makes it an unsafe living condition because she could flip out on her child, go crazy, or not be herself.She is unable to pay her bills or manage her finances due to her addiction. Personally, I have learned a lot from the interview and from the readings. I think that the readings related to the case situation that the social worker mentioned. Child protective services were involved in this case. I think that they made the right decision into getting the 9 year old boy into their custody. If he stayed with his mother any longer he would not have got counseling, psychological help, and he would be pretty messed up.Some young children show behavioral issues or act out when they go through family or household problems. As a social worker it must be hard to get involved in situations and cases like those. References Gosselin, D. (2010). An Introduction to the Crimes of Family Abuse. History of Violence in the Family, 4, 31-56. Gosselin, D. (2010). An Introduction to the Crimes of Family Abuse. Child Abuse, 4, 85-112. Module 3 Commentary: Domestic Violence: Children, the Youngest Victims.

Tatay

Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that ARVE V. ABARIENTOS was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment.Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that JEVEVRIEL R. AMANTE was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations.He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that PHILIP L. BAUGBOG was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013.Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATIONTO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that FREDERICK JOHN B. BRILA was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Educa tionNational Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that ELYMAR M. CABALLAS was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment.Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that JEFFBECK D. CALILAP was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations.He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that NOE C. CECILIO was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013.Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is he reby issued in connection with his application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATIONTO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that JOHN BRYAN T. COLICO was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of EducationNational Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that ELWIN DAVE P. CUADRA was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment.Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that IVAN LEXTER P. DELA CRUZ was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Record s of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations.He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that RODEL T. FELIZMENA was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013.Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his applica tion for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN;This is to certify that EMERSON V. GUTIERREZ was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City SchoolsISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Ext ension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that MICO B. INGAT was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school sealRepublic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that JEFFREY M. MEDINA was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was n ot involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment.Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that JAMES ALELIO L. MENDOZA was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations.He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2 013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that DAIMIEL ALEXANDER E. PASION was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013.Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon Ci ty CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN;This is to certify that FRANCIS B. RAMOS was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR.HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that MARIEL DC. ABLAZA was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school sealRepublic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that LOVELY S. ANA was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment.Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid with out school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that TRISHIA MAE A. ARROYO was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations.He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certi fy that KRISTINE MAE E. BALDEO was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013.Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATIONTO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that ANGELICA G. BALINGIT was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. She observ ed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of EducationNational Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that MARY CRIS D. BARALLA was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment.Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philip pines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that JESSELLE Q. BATO was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations.She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that REGILYN R. BORNALES was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013.Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN;This is to certify that CAMILLE G. CABULOS was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this s chool. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR.HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that MYLENE H. COPIA was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school sealRepublic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Regio n Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that ANNE LA RENCH C. CRUZ was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment.Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that DIANA CHARISSE B. DASIG was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Yea r 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations.She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that JACQUILYN G. GEQUILLANA was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013.Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby is sued in connection with her application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN;This is to certify that MERIAM L. HOYOA was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MAT HAY SR.HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that JERRIE MAY V. ILAGA was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school sealRepublic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that RODILYN M. LEONA was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office sh ow that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment.Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that JOVELYN E. MONILLA was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations.She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolmen t. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that ALDREA MARGARITA D. PAULAR was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013.Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, G SIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN;This is to certify that LORENA J. RAMOS was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR.HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that SALVE REGINA S. SABADO was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school sealRepublic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that JOAN M. SILVA was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment.Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that JULLIE ANNE V. SILVA was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations.She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that CRISTALYN MAE R. TORRES was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013.Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN;This is to certify that JERALDINE O. VELASCO was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to ou r school rules and regulations. She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR.HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that ROSSANA MARIE B. ZAPATA was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not va lid without school seal Tatay Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that ARVE V. ABARIENTOS was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment.Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that JEVEVRIEL R. AMANTE was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations.He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that PHILIP L. BAUGBOG was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013.Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATIONTO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that FREDERICK JOHN B. BRILA was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Educa tionNational Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that ELYMAR M. CABALLAS was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment.Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that JEFFBECK D. CALILAP was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations.He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that NOE C. CECILIO was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013.Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is he reby issued in connection with his application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATIONTO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that JOHN BRYAN T. COLICO was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of EducationNational Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that ELWIN DAVE P. CUADRA was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment.Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that IVAN LEXTER P. DELA CRUZ was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Record s of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations.He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that RODEL T. FELIZMENA was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013.Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his applica tion for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN;This is to certify that EMERSON V. GUTIERREZ was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City SchoolsISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Ext ension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that MICO B. INGAT was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school sealRepublic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that JEFFREY M. MEDINA was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was n ot involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment.Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that JAMES ALELIO L. MENDOZA was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations.He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2 013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that DAIMIEL ALEXANDER E. PASION was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013.Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon Ci ty CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN;This is to certify that FRANCIS B. RAMOS was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR.HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that MARIEL DC. ABLAZA was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school sealRepublic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that LOVELY S. ANA was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment.Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid with out school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that TRISHIA MAE A. ARROYO was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations.He observed good moral conduct during his stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with his application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certi fy that KRISTINE MAE E. BALDEO was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013.Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATIONTO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that ANGELICA G. BALINGIT was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. She observ ed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of EducationNational Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that MARY CRIS D. BARALLA was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment.Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philip pines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that JESSELLE Q. BATO was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations.She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that REGILYN R. BORNALES was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013.Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN;This is to certify that CAMILLE G. CABULOS was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this s chool. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR.HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that MYLENE H. COPIA was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school sealRepublic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Regio n Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that ANNE LA RENCH C. CRUZ was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment.Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that DIANA CHARISSE B. DASIG was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Yea r 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations.She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that JACQUILYN G. GEQUILLANA was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013.Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby is sued in connection with her application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN;This is to certify that MERIAM L. HOYOA was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MAT HAY SR.HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that JERRIE MAY V. ILAGA was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school sealRepublic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that RODILYN M. LEONA was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office sh ow that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment.Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that JOVELYN E. MONILLA was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations.She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolmen t. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that ALDREA MARGARITA D. PAULAR was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013.Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, G SIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN;This is to certify that LORENA J. RAMOS was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR.HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that SALVE REGINA S. SABADO was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school sealRepublic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that JOAN M. SILVA was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment.Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that JULLIE ANNE V. SILVA was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations.She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that CRISTALYN MAE R. TORRES was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013.Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR. HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN;This is to certify that JERALDINE O. VELASCO was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to ou r school rules and regulations. She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not valid without school seal Republic of the Philippines Department of Education National Capital Region Division of City Schools ISMAEL MATHAY SR.HIGH SCHOOL Branches Extension, GSIS Village, Sangandaan, Quezon City CERTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; This is to certify that ROSSANA MARIE B. ZAPATA was a bonafide student of this school, for the School Year 2012 – 2013. Records of this office show that the above named student was not involved in any incident in violation to our school rules and regulations. She observed good moral conduct during her stay in this school. This certification is hereby issued in connection with her application for enrolment. Given this 20th day of March, 2013. LYDIA SOLIVA-RAMOS Principal IV Not va lid without school seal